Home Legal News Calling Woman ‘R*ndi’ Outrages Her Modesty Says Delhi Court as Man Gets Convicted for Criminal Intimidation
Legal News

Calling Woman ‘R*ndi’ Outrages Her Modesty Says Delhi Court as Man Gets Convicted for Criminal Intimidation

Share
Share

In a significant ruling, a Delhi court has held that referring to a woman as ‘randi’ — a term denoting a sex worker — constitutes an offence under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code for insulting a woman’s modesty. The Court observed that such language is not a mere insult but a direct assault on a woman’s dignity and character.

Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Harjot Singh Aujila of the Dwarka Courts made the observation while convicting Vikrant Grewal, who had threatened and harassed a woman both over phone and at her residence in 2021.

“The word ‘randi’ is not a word which is used simply to insult a person. The word is bound to insult the modesty of any hardworking woman. Especially, when this word is used to a woman, it denotes that the said woman is not loyal… It directly hits at the sex of a woman and casts an aspersion on her character,” the Court said.

Grewal had used highly offensive and threatening language, including:

“Darwaja khol de mujhe tere saath sex karna hai”,
“Randi tujhe mai bataunga bahut samajhdar apne to samajahti hai”, and
“Randi Darwaja Khol de nahi to mai tujhe chodunga nahi.”

The Court further noted that he used threats such as “Darwaja nahi khola toh goli maar dunga”, which clearly amounts to criminal intimidation under Section 503 IPC.

Despite attempts by the defense to discredit the complainant’s testimony, the Court said:

“The testimony of PW1 is clear, cogent, reliable, trustworthy and she has not deviated from her statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. During the cross-examination, nothing material has come up… to shake her credibility.”

The defense also objected to the admissibility of WhatsApp messages under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. However, the Court rejected the argument since the accused had voluntarily admitted to sending the messages.

“In lieu of Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that facts admitted need not be proved, argument raised by the defense is rejected,” it ruled.

Grewal was convicted for both outraging the modesty of a woman and criminal intimidation. The matter is now listed for sentencing on July 27.

Case: State vs Vikrant Grewal – Available on LAWFYI.IO

Subscription Box

Subscribe to LawPost

Subscribe to our free newsletter to get all the latest legal news instantly!

Related Articles

Big Trouble for McDonald’s, Gujarati Company Says You Don’t Own “Mc” It’s McPatel Now

In a David-versus-Goliath legal face-off, Gujarat-based snack manufacturer McPatel Foods Private Limited...

Law Student Sued Her University for Mental Stress and Received Compensation of ₹46,000

In a strong rebuke to administrative apathy, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal...

LL.M Abroad Won’t Fix What Indian Law Schools Are Failing At, CJI Gavai

Don’t Chase Prestige, Build Purpose: CJI Gavai Urges Law Grads to Rethink...

Lawyer Suspended for 2 Years After Charging ₹80,000 as ‘Court Fee’

In a major disciplinary action, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa...