Home High Courts Karnataka High Court Stays FIR Against IIM-B Director and Faculty in Caste Discrimination Case
High CourtsKarnataka High Court

Karnataka High Court Stays FIR Against IIM-B Director and Faculty in Caste Discrimination Case

Share
Share

The Karnataka High Court has stayed the FIR and any further investigation against the director and seven faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore (IIM-B) in connection with allegations of caste-based discrimination. This ruling came after the court issued an interim order on December 31, 2024, halting the probe until further orders.

Justice Hemant Chandangoudar, while passing the interim order, noted that the FIR, registered by Bengaluru police on December 20, 2024, would not proceed for now. The accused individuals—director Rishikesha T Krishnan, and faculty members Dinesh Kumar, G Shainesh, Srinivas Prakhya, Sreelata Jonnalagedda, Rahul De, Ashis Mishra, and Chetan Subramanian—will not face further investigation at this stage.

The case stems from a complaint made by an associate professor at IIM-B, who alleged that the accused intentionally revealed his caste identity, subjected him to humiliation, and discriminated against him based on caste. However, the petitioners, represented by Senior Advocates Udaya Holla and K Diwakar, countered these claims, suggesting that the allegations arose only after the complainant’s promotion was denied. The counsel also highlighted that the complainant was facing harassment allegations from students, with a committee finding merit in their claims.

The Court issued notices to both the State and the complainant, seeking responses within two weeks. A detailed order is awaited as the matter continues to unfold.

The stay on the FIR offers temporary relief to the accused as the legal process moves forward.

Subscription Box

Subscribe to LawPost

Subscribe to our free newsletter to get all the latest legal news instantly!

Related Articles

PIL seeking special courts for cybercrimes has been dismissed by the Delhi High Court

In a significant order, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL that...

Wife Demands ₹13 Lakh Maintenance After Divorcing Husband Over Eating Onion & Garlic in Gujarat High Court

n a remarkable case highlighting how deeply personal beliefs can strain a...

Karnataka High Court Says No to Menstrual Leave, But Quickly Changes Its Mind in Dramatic Reversal

In a dramatic turn of events on Tuesday, the Karnataka High Court recalled...

Highly Qualified but Jobless Wife Still Entitled to Maintenance, Rules Kerala High Court

n a significant ruling reinforcing the welfare mandate of maintenance laws, the...